BW National League Preview for 2006
With the reasonable accuracy of last year’s BW NL Preview, and in the spirit of fun, I would like to continue the NL Preview for upcoming 2006 season.
If you recall, my thought was to try to calculate the expected runs scored versus the expected runs yielded for each team. This is the best predictor of wins and losses from a simple statistics view.
Since starting lineups, rotations and defenses are not known at this time, lefty/righty numbers are not used, this review is simply a rough estimate based upon the entire preseason roster, just to give a preview of what might occur. I performed a rough analysis based upon each team’s preseason roster as follows:
For Expected Runs scored:
I used each hitter’s At Bats X OB X Slugging to arrive at expected runs. I summed each teams hitting roster, and prorated it based upon 5640 At Bats (the average number of At Bats per team on my replay runs).
For Expected Runs Yielded:
I used each pitcher’s Innings X ERA to arrive at earned runs for each pitcher. This was summed for all pitchers on the team’s roster and then prorated for 1450 innings (the average number of Innings per team on my replay runs).
I then added a flat 72 runs per team for unearned runs since I did not consider each team’s defense in this review, although that may be a nice improvement.
.
The resulting table for the BW Aaron Division follows:
Team |
Expected
Runs Scored |
Expected
Runs Yielded |
Expected
Run Differential |
Buckeye Eclipse |
964.3 |
667.4 |
296.9 |
|
870.3 |
707.5 |
162.8 |
Annadale Anteaters |
826.6 |
767.5 |
59.0 |
|
826.7 |
804.8 |
21.9 |
Port Richey Sandcranes |
723.0 |
769.9 |
-46.9 |
Taggart Titans |
734.5 |
882.5 |
-148.0 |
Here is the powerful Mays Division, note the powerhouses:
Team |
Expected
Runs Scored |
Expected
Runs Yielded |
Expected
Run Differential |
Northwoods Moose |
920.8 |
664.1 |
256.6 |
|
905.4 |
655.1 |
250.3 |
|
878.7 |
630.5 |
248.3 |
|
862.6 |
643.1 |
219.5 |
Aspen Rainmakers |
839.0 |
683.9 |
155.1 |
|
845.9 |
733.2 |
112.7 |
Based upon the expected runs scored/runs yielded table we can estimate the expected wins and losses using the Bill James Pythagorean formula. Here is the expected wins table for the Aaron Division:
Team |
Expected
Wins |
Expected
Losses |
Expected
PCT |
Buckeye Eclipse |
109 |
53 |
.676 |
|
97 |
65 |
.602 |
Annadale Anteaters |
87 |
75 |
.537 |
|
83 |
79 |
.513 |
Port Richey Sandcranes |
76 |
86 |
.469 |
Taggart Titans |
66 |
96 |
.409 |
Here are the expected wins for the Mays Division:
Team |
Expected
Wins |
Expected
Losses |
Expected
PCT |
|
107 |
55 |
.660 |
Northwoods Moose |
106 |
56 |
.658 |
|
106 |
56 |
.656 |
|
104 |
58 |
.643 |
Aspen RainMakers |
97 |
65 |
.601 |
|
92 |
70 |
.571 |
So, as you can see, it appears to be a very competitive year once again in the NL of BW. The Mays Division appears loaded with powerhouses!
Hope that you find this interesting. The attached EXCEL is the detail that corresponds to these tables. Your input to this process is appreciated.
Thanks
Mike
Complete Breakdown of
Expected Win/Loss Calculation in Excel Spreadsheet Form.